More Support. Awesome Feedback. Professional Lessons.
Welcome to the GL365 Academy!
I’ve heard some musicians say that musical ear is developed at a young age. I know it does get difficult as one ages but is it achievable?
I’m 28 years old, decent enough Blues player and currently exploring Metal. The problem I face is composing. A lot of ideas (both rhythm and lead) float in my head but I’m unable to replicate those on my instrument. If I’m able to replicate some of them, I get stuck on how to move forward and complete it.
I asked this question in one of your Youtube live chat. Please let me know. I’m very eager to write my own music.
Hey Suhail! You can absolutely develop your ear at any age and to a very high degree at that.
I think younger people are more adept at developing perfect pitch, but for relative pitch, which is the skill that what will enable you to freely compose, improvise and transcribe music can be developed at any age. And there is no limit to where you can take it. You ear can keep improving into a very old age. 🙂
It is relative pitch that you will learn in this course.
Carl I cant find the pdf for the solfege exercises
Hey Read, there is no PDF for that chapter. The entire thing is just an audio ear training session.
Ive learnt so much from your videos, if im able to reach the level of playing I aspire to reach you are going to be the reason…
Cheers to you.
Thanks a bunch Shalina!
Great lesson. Thanks. I am curious – are proofs for these “formulas” to determine the sharp/flats taught in music theory class. Do they exist? Is it like math (calculus, algebra, geometry) where proofs are taught along with empirical examples to show it is correct. Obviously it sounds right/great ( i.e. empirical) but is there a science behind it. In other words, can these “formulas” be determined without listening to the notes?
Hey Ken, sorry but I don’t know what you mean as “proofs”. 🙂
Hey Carl, I’ve been listening to TOOL a lot lately (you should do a lesson on Vicarious btw) and their use of time signatures is very interesting and I’ve been wanting to learn more about them. Do you have any lessons on time signatures and differences between them/ how to use them effectively? Thanks!
Hi Carl, I absolutely love this site there is so much information! I was wondering how long did you practice a day when you were truly honing your craft???Because I want to be a pro guitar player, but I don’t know how long i should practice a day. Ive been aiming for 6-8 hours, but I don’t want to hurt my hands and overdue it, but I alson dont want to not practice enough. I usually split my practice session in half, with half of it working on your different course, and the other half working on songs Ive gotta perform with my band. When I do 6 hours I do 45 min each for the categories ear training, improvisations, chords/progressions, and technique, and then the rest of the 3 hours i work on songs. And then for 8 hours I do an hour on each category, and then I spend the rest of the 4 hours on the songs. Any advice??
Hey Luke, great to hear your are putting so much time and dedication into your playing!
Personally, when I was a teenager and had to attend school, I usually could play no more than 2-3 hours a day and it was mostly technique exercises.
When I graduated school at 17, it allowed me to REALLY focus on my playing and overall musicianship. I probably spent the next five years playing guitar or studying theory/ear training 8-10 hours a day while also teaching at a local music store.
Over the years my practice has varied quite a bit. For instance, when I moved to LA in 2000 with my band, I became pretty burned out on rock/metal guitar and switched my focus to classical guitar and composing music for orchestras until about 2007 when I started playing rock again. I was still getting probably 8 hours a study/practice in a day at that time. These days, I am lucky to get an hour or two to work on my own stuff because I have more responsibilities for GL365 and life in general.
The key is not to burn yourself out. Keep your mind open for other styles or areas of study that might interest you so that you can always be studying something fresh and it will make you a well rounded musician. That is why I cover such a large variety of styles on the site, because I was always looking for new things to learn about music. 🙂 Keep up the good work!
Cool, thank u for the advice carl!!
Hi carl i love this cite, i was wondering if you were thinking of creating a category with a full on study on frusciante, hendrix, mayer, and ray vaughn’s style of guitar playing. Fully delving in on their songs and they’re different techniques/tones. Just an idea. Once again thanks for this site it has truly helped me improve. My technique has vastly gotten better because of this site so thank u so much.
Hey Luke, thanks a bunch for the feedback on the lessons!
I have been getting some requests to put more lessons in the legendary styles category of the academy and all of those players would make for great topics. My plan now is not to do a huge amount of lessons on each artist, like I did with Eric Johnson, but instead to do maybe 2-3 videos for each artist focusing on the most definitive parts of their playing styles. I will get to work on it!
Ok sounds good, thank u carl for this site it is awesome. I’m learning loads of information! Thank u!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.